wordyweb


The Circuits of Reading the Digital: Some Models
September 16, 2011, 1:33 pm
Filed under: Uncategorized

Here it is, short and sweet, a rough draft of a proposal for the conference “Research Foundations for Understanding Books and Reading in the Digital Age: Text and Beyond” (in Kyoto, Japan, Ritsumeikan University: http://tinyurl.com/4yakpa7):

In theorizing reading the digital text, I will take a two-pronged approach: a) what aspects of reading cannot be accounted for by the types of digital textual analysis done so far in the digital humanities, and b) how can technology (be “used” to) account for such possibilities? To answer the second question, we need to stop seeing the computer as a “means” (i.e. we “use” a computer) and to start thinking about the computer itself as a part of the literary process. To ask such a question is perhaps to blur the distinction between e-literature and media studies on the one hand, and digital humanities on the other. At the same time, it presupposes that technology is not something to be feared (as “tampering” with the text), but that it is rather something intrinsic, to be conceived in its own terms. Indeed, the computer can enhance the literary experience and highlight aspects of the text that weren’t noticed before, and vice versa, in a sort of feedback circuit, bringing with it hermeneutic questions that hitherto have been only indirect. What might we discover from exploring the symbiotic relationship between the text and the machine and about the minds and bodies that encounter these? Such encounters occur not only through visualization, but through sonorization and through the body. Such work requires a broader view of language than that provided by information theory, which has apparently dominated digital literary studies. I will use my own digital humanities project on the visualization of French poet Stéphane Mallarmé’s works (http://mallarme.uvic.ca) to explore this.

Thanks to Lori Emerson (UC, Boulder) and Stephen Ross (UVic) for some insights into this.

Advertisement

3 Comments so far
Leave a comment

I don’t think you can mention “hermeneutics” and your title should have something like “in/the” in it to make it seem cleverer.

Comment by Stephen Ross (@GhostProf)

hee-hee.

Comment by Stephen Ross (@GhostProf)

Quite a bit reworded… Still no “in/the”, though. One thing I needed to make explicit was the mutually-dependent relationship between text and machine.

Comment by wordyweb




Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s



Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.